Legal Opinion
Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 28, 1996No. CA A85110PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of orders of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the Board) that declared him to be a predatory sex offender. ORS 181.585 to ORS 181.589. We consider only his argument that designating him a predatory sex offender imposed punishment for a crime that he committed before the adoption of the applicable statutes and thus violated the ex post facto clauses of the state and federal constitutions. Or Const, Art I, § 21; US Const, Art I, § 10. Because the designation does not in itself constitute punishment, we affirm.
Under ORS 181.585, a person who has been…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Mannelin v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Hibbard v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.