Legal Opinion
Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1998No. CA A89837; SC S43922PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) that designated him as a “predatory sex offender” pursuant to ORS 181.585 et seg. He challenges the predatory sex offender statutes on various substantive constitutional grounds. He also contends that the Board’s designation decision was defective procedurally—in particular, he asserts that the Board violated the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA) and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution by designating him as a predatory sex offender without providing him with prior…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Espindola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- State v. GermaneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.