Legal Opinion

Aeschliman v. Chryst

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1957No. 34231Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondent upon findings of fact and conclusions of law, based upon stipulated facts, in an action for forcible detainer instituted pursuant to RCW 59.12.020 (2). The parties are farmers who for several years have occupied adjoining farms in Whitman county. It is admitted by the pleadings that appellants made a statutory demand upon respondent for possession of the land in question more than three days prior to the commencement of the action, and that respondent refused to comply therewith.

*510The facts set forth in a .written stipulation are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Priestley Mining & Milling Co. v. Lenox Mining & Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Randolph v. HuschWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API