Dutcher v. Sanders
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Imperial County, denying a motion for a new trial. Franklin J. Cole, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action of forcible -detainer. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial, and from an order denying his motion, prosecutes this appeal.
The action grows out of the following facts: The land, consisting of one hundred and sixty acres in Imperial County, was, in 1903, unoccupied government land. In February of said year, one Johnson made a desert-land entry thereon, and in July, 1905, made final proof of occupation and reclamation thereof. In June of said year she assigned and transferred her title and interest therein to plaintiff, who, on June 28,1907, after doing considerable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCauley v. WellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Voll v. HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Carteri v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Potter v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Giddings v. '76 Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baxley v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Woodbury v. BunkerUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Ridpath v. DeneeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Moldovan v. FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Randolph v. HuschWashington Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.