Legal Opinion

Leingang v. Geller, Ward & Hasner Hardware Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 19, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case, reassigned to the writer at the present term, is an action for damages for personal injuries, in which plaintiff recovered judgment for $10,000, and defendant appealed. The sufficiency of the evidence to make a case for the jury is not challenged. The appeal presents questions concerning the nature and extent of plaintiff's injuries, the admission of certain evidence, the instructions and remarks of plaintiff's counsel in argument.

Plaintiff was an employee of defendant, a corporation operating a wholesale hardware establishment. His evidence tends to show that at the time of his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Hall v. Manufacturers Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Smoot v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Radtke v. St. Louis Basket & Box Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Demoulin v. RoetheliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. Varley v. MotylSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Dodson v. Gate City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. O'Shaughnessy v. BrownleeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Crossno v. TaubeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API