Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Linn Court of Common Pleas. — Hon. Thomas Whitaker, Judge At the time of the ejection from defendant’s train complained of in this action, a rule in force on defendant’s road prohibited the carrying of passengers on extra freight trains.
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.
— This was an action for damages which plaintiff alleged that he sustained from’ an injury received by him in consequence of being pushed off the platform of defendant’s car, by the conductor of the train, while the train was in motion. The evidence shows that in July, 1872, the plaintiff arrived at Chillicothe, after the defendant’s passenger train going east had passed that point, and being anxious to reach Brookfield, went to the depot and inquired of a telegraph operator in defendant’s employment, when the next train would go east. The operator informed him that there would be no train…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Birge v. GardinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Garretzen v. DuenckelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Snyder v. Han. & St. Jos. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Loyd v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Owens v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- William Laurie Co. v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- McFadin v. CatronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Littell v. Bi-State Transit Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.