Legal Opinion

Radtke v. St. Louis Basket & Box Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 14, 1910PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — How. Geo. H. Shields, Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing to give the instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence offered by defendant at the close of all the evidence. Grattis v. Railroad, 153 Mo. 380; Reichl v. Flynn, 196 Pa.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — How. Geo. H. Shields, Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing to give the instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence offered by defendant at the close of all the evidence. Grattis v. Railroad, 153 Mo. 380; Reichl v. Flynn, 196 Pa. St. '2:63; Day harsh v. Railroad, 103 Mo. 570; Fogarty v. Transit Co., 180 Mo. 490; Hawk v. Lumber Co., 166 Mo. 121; Garland v. Railroad, 85 Mo. 581; Gaul v. Beckstein, 173 111. 183; Reed v. Stockmeyer, 74 Fed. 186; Hussey v. Coger, 112 N. Y. 614; Klochinsky v. Lumber Co., 93 Wis. 417; Gain v. Railroad, 101…

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

— Action for personal injuries, with damages alleged in the aggregate sum of $25,000. Verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $10,000’, from which defendant has appealed. As indicated by ■the name, defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacturing business and to that end had and ope*7rated a factory in the city of St. Lotus, in which factory plaintiff was one of its employees. His employment was through one Albert Schmidt, a foreman of the defendant. The petition is minute in detail and of great length, but boiled down, it avers: that plaintiff was working on a machine in said…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tinkle v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Smoot v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Young v. Shickle, Harrison & Howard Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Fogarty v. St. Louis Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  5. Heinz v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kleinlein v. FoskinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Laycock v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. State v. RafterySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Burnison v. SoundersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. State v. LangfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API