Gillikin v. Bell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
If, as alleged, defendant with the intent to prevent plaintiff from recovering damages for the wrongful death of his intestate, took pictures falsely depicting conditions at the wreck and knowingly used or permitted the use of such pictures in the trial of plaintiff’s action, he would be guilty of perjury or subornation of perjury. This conduct would support criminal prosecution but would not create civil liability. Gillikin v. Springle, ante 240.
We do not understand from our reading of the complaint that plaintiff intends to allege a wrongful act done to the body, but if 'he does intend to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Kelley v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Bremmer v. Journal-Tribune Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Kelly v. Johnson Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Henry v. DeenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Robinson v. United States Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Bello v. Random House, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.