Legal Opinion
Henry v. Deen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 15, 1983No. 8220SC266PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The plaintiff contends the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to amend the complaint, (2) dismissing the complaint as it related to defendant Niazi, (3) dismissing the claim of civil conspiracy against defendants Deen and Hall and (4) granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and strike from the complaint those paragraphs relating to punitive damages.
We first consider plaintiffs argument that his motion to amend the complaint on 30 November 1981 was improperly denied. Rule 15(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure sets out the conditions for amending pleadings.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Shugar v. GuillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Jackson v. Blue Dolphin Communications of North Carolina, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Hawkins v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Huff v. ChrismonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Duncan v. AMMONS CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.