Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
The primary issue in this case is whether North Carolina’s General Assembly exceeded its constitutional authority in enacting a cap, or limit, on the award of punitive damages.
North Carolina General Statute § ID-25 became effective on 1 January 1996 and placed a cap on the amount of punitive damages that could be awarded at $250,000 or three times the compensatory damages, whichever is larger.
Here, plaintiffs Dan Rhyne (Mr. Rhyne) and Alice Rhyne (Mrs. Rhyne), husband and wife, received verdicts for compensatory damages in the amounts of $8,255 and $10,730, respectively, against *675…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Affordable Care, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Everhart v. O'CHARLEY'S INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Kor Xiong v. MarksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.