State v. Randolph
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
Defendant appeals from a jury conviction of assault and robbery while being armed with a dangerous weapon. The sole question on appeal relates to alleged hearsay testimony given by a police officer which defendant claims was prejudicial error.
At the trial the evidence disclosed that the robbery was committed at a small grocery store. The only persons present during the robbery were the manager of the store and a clerk. Later when defendant was in custody on another charge and he became a suspect for the instant robbery, he was viewed in a police lineup by the manager of the store. The manager…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State of Oregon v. LaneganOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. HoughtonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. OpieOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. NunesOregon Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LehmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. WaitesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Wheeler v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.