Legal Opinion

State v. Randolph

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1968PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Defendant appeals from a jury conviction of assault and robbery while being armed with a dangerous weapon. The sole question on appeal relates to alleged hearsay testimony given by a police officer which defendant claims was prejudicial error.

At the trial the evidence disclosed that the robbery was committed at a small grocery store. The only persons present during the robbery were the manager of the store and a clerk. Later when defendant was in custody on another charge and he became a suspect for the instant robbery, he was viewed in a police lineup by the manager of the store. The manager…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State of Oregon v. LaneganOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. HoughtonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State v. OpieOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. NunesOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LehmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. WaitesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Wheeler v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API