Wheeler v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This post-conviction proceeding arises out of the defendant’s conviction for unarmed robbery, ORS 163.290, and the subsequent dismissal of an appeal therefrom.
The petition under consideration asserts five causes of action. The first claims the improper use at trial of a confession and of an in-custody identification obtained before he was advised of either his right to remain silent or his right to counsel. The case was tried before a jury. An in camera hearing was held by the court to determine the admissibility of the confession, and the court held that it was admissible. Following his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lerch v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Strasser v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Stewart v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Barnes v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Cole v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.