Legal Opinion

State v. Houghton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1903PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Charles, better known as “Chick” Houghton, was convicted of an assault with intent to rob, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

The defendant was charged with the crime of robbery from the person of one Balch, by assault and putting in fear, and upon his trial was convicted of an assault with intent to rob. . Balch was assaulted by three men, and robbed of a check for $7, and $20 to $25 in money, about 11 o’clock on the night of November 7, 1902, on a street in the “North End” of the City of Portland. A short time before the robbery he was in the Mint saloon, and while there received change for a twenty-dollar gold piece. Several persons, strangers to him, were in the saloon at the time, one of whom he testifies was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Murphy, Alias Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. O'Toole v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Commonwealth v. FaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Basoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. SkillicornOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. State of Oregon v. LaneganOregon Supreme Court · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API