Legal Opinion
Tony Santillanes v. United States Parole Commission and Bureau of Prisons
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1985No. 83-1838PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a), Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.
Appellant appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Appellant was convicted on March 12, 1973, and sentenced to a term of ten years imprisonment. After serving about 63 months of his sentence, he was released on parole. Almost four…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Rondal R. Francis v. R.H. Rison, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Paulsen v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lee v. WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.