Legal Opinion
Paulsen v. Daniels
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2005No. 03-35337, 03-35360, 03-35356, 03-35355, 03-35354, 03-35352, 03-35351, 03-35350, 03-35349, 03-35347, 03-35346, 03-35344, 03-35343, 03-35341, 03-35340, 03-35339PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
We consider in this appeal whether the Bureau of Prisons (“Bureau”) violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) in adopting an interim regulation pertaining to an early release incentive program for federal prisoners who had successfully completed a substance abuse program. We conclude that the district court correctly held that the Bureau violated the APA, and that the petitioners were entitled to relief.
I
This appeal is the latest chapter in a series of cases concerning a program created by Congress for the purpose of supplying substance abuse treatment to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Samuel KamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Arrington v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- California Wilderness Coalition v. U.S. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. BoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.