Legal Opinion
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 30, 1997No. C3-95-2409PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
In this matter, we are asked to determine whether an insurance policy covering liability resulting from an “occurrence” provides coverage where an allegedly negligent act occurs during the period of policy coverage, but the negligence does not result in damages until after the policy has expired. Respondent Jenoff, Inc. (“Jenoff’) purchased an “Umbrella Liability Policy” (“Liability Policy”) from appellant New Hampshire Insurance Company (“New Hampshire”) providing coverage for the period from January 1, 1976, to January 1,1977. Jenoff seeks coverage under the policy…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- General Mills, Inc. v. Gold Medal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Olmsted Medical Center v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.