Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Dandy-Jim, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Christine T. McMonagle, Judge.
{¶ 1} This is an insurance-coverage case. We are asked to decide whether the trial court erred in ruling that plaintiff-appellant, Motorists Mutual Insurance Company (“Motorists”), was obligated to defend its insured, Dandy-Jim, Inc., in a suit alleging a violation of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) due to the transmission of unsolicited facsimile advertisements. We find no error and affirm.
Background
{¶ 2} The TCPA, Section 227, Title 47, U.S.Code et seq., protects the privacy interests of persons by placing restrictions on unsolicited,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Charvat v. NMP, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Penzer v. Transportation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. LayIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hiar Holding, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- State Farm General Insurance v. JT's Frames, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.