E.T. Barwick Industries, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment with regard to the claims brought by plaintiffs and defendant Heller’s motion for partial summary judgment with regard to certain defenses raised by plaintiffs in response to defendant Heller’s Counterclaim. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on every issue except the issues relating to plaintiffs’ claims with respect to the application of funds to the April 1979 note which was guaranteed by E.T. Barwick. The Court desires to hold an oral…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brokerage Concepts v. US Healthcare Inc (Part II)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Cooper v. Toshiba Home Tech. Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
- Browder v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Bryant v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.