Legal Opinion
U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 23, 1993No. 91-8854PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a jury verdict imposing civil liability for alleged predatory pricing in violation of the antitrust laws. More specifically, appellants Rule Industries, Inc. (“Rule”) and Tie Down Engineering, Inc. (“Tie Down”), defendants below, appeal the district court’s denial of their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on claims by U.S. Anchor Manufacturing, Inc. (“U.S. Anchor”) that Rule and Tie Down attempted and conspired to monopolize the United States market for light weight fluke-style anchors for small boats by means of below-cost pricing…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Gravity Inc v. Microsoft CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jimmy D. Morris, Franklin W. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Intergraph Corporation v. Intel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Farmland Dairy Farms, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.