Legal Opinion

Browder v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided January 27, 1998No. Civil Action 96-D-789-NPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court is the November 26, 1997 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Van-zetta Penn McPherson (“Recomm.”) regarding Defendant General Motors Corporation’s (“GM”) Motion To Strike filed October 20, 1997. GM seeks to have stricken Plaintiffs theories of defect that were previously un-pled or undisclosed. The Magistrate Judge recommends that GM’s Motion To Strike be granted; specifically that Plaintiff not be allowed to proceed with his theories of defect related to: (1) seat-belt anchorage points; (2) door latch defects; and (3) window…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Toshiba Home Tech. Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  2. Parrish v. FREIGHTLINER, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
  3. Lambert v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (In Re Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
  4. Bartell Ranch LLC v. McCulloughDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  5. Houghton v. Rancho Mesquite Casino, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API