Morgan v. Cleveland Cloth Mills

Tbe following is tbe only exception and assignment of error made by tbe employer and carrier: “Tbe signing of tbe judgment sustaining findings of fact and conclusions of law of tbe North Carolina Industrial Commission.”

We do not think tbis exception and assignment of error can be sustained. Tbe evidence is to tbe effect tbat tbe plaintiffs are tbe widow and children of Thomas P. Morgan, who was employed by tbe Cleveland Cloth Mills as a piece worker. Tbis breadwinner, as it was bis duty to do, went to tbe mill to report for work at 6 o’clock on tbe winter morning of 13 February, 1933. These…