Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Shpegel-Dimsey, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1988No. B021974PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPENCER, P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiff City of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Shpegel-Dimsey, Inc.

Statement of Facts

Defendant does business as Pioneer Plastics at several adjacent premises in Los Angeles. The premises are used primarily for the conversion of scrap plastic into plastic pellets by a process known as extrusion. Defendant maintains large indoor and outdoor storage areas for scrap plastic materials.

Plaintiff’s Fire Code contains a number of regulations detailing the requirements for the storage of combustible materials, including plastics,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. v. Howell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Onciano v. Golden Palace Restaurant, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Westlands Water Dist. v. Amoco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Wienholz v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API