Chris Taylor v. John Chiang
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUCK, Senior District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This putative class action has a long and tortuous history in this Court. Presumably this opinion will be known as Taylor V. 1 Appellants challenge the constitutionality of California’s Unclaimed Property Law (“UPL”), which provides for the conditional transfer of unclaimed property to the State of California. 2 While this Court has previously held the UPL facially constitutional, see Taylor III, 525 F.3d at 1289, the instant suit challenges the California State Controller Betty Yee’s (“the Controller”) application of the statute. 3 Appellants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Thomas Richey v. D. DahneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Andrew Grimm v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Bryan v. City of CarlsbadDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Vladik Bykov v. Steven RosenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- City of Seattle v. Monsanto Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.