Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bostick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1978No. 76-4529, SC 25106PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH, J.,

Pro Tempore.

Plaintiff brought this action against her former husband, alleging that he had "engaged in an intentional course of conduct designed to inflict emotional stress and mental anguish.” The conduct complained of consisted of 10 incidents, some of which were individual acts and some of which were groups of substantially identical acts committed at different times. The jury returned a verdict for $7,500 general damages and $10,000 punitive damages. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

The parties separated in May, 1973, after a nine-year marriage. The first of the incidents…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Landman v. RoysterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Erlandson v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Holdner v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Jeffries v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API