Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. A8902-01014; CA A64191PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De MUNIZ, j.

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (Tri-Met) appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages on his claim of discrimination on account of a physical impairment in violation of ORS 659.425(1). 1 We affirm.

We recite the facts in plaintiffs favor. Or Const, Art VII (amended) § 3; Jorritsma v. Farmers’ Feed & Supply, 272 Or 499, 502, 538 P2d 61 (1975).

Tri-Met hired plaintiff as a bus driver in 1976. He became a dispatcher in 1982 and remained in that position until 1989, when his employment ended. In 1985, he was diagnosed as HIV positive. 2 Early in 1987, he informed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Davis v. BostickOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Shives v. ChamberlainOregon Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. BOARDMASTER CORPORATION v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Erwin v. TetreaultCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API