Legal Opinion

Erlandson v. Pullen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 4, 1980No. A76-09-12875, CA 11941PublishedCited by 20 opinions

GILLETTE, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against his former business partner, Troutman (hereafter "defendant”), and Troutman’s attorney, Pullen, alleging, in four counts: wrongful initiation of a civil proceeding; intentional interference with a business relationship; outrageous conduct; and slander of title. The trial court dismissed the suit as to Pullen and granted a directed verdict for defendant after trial. The case went to the jury solely on defendant’s first counterclaim, which alleged that plaintiff intentionally and willfully interfered with the contractual relationship between defendant and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pakos v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Christofferson v. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Lee v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API