Groesbeck v. Board of State Canvassers
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
On petition of plaintiff, Alexander J. Grroesbeck, defendant, board of State canvassers, is conducting a recount of tbe votes cast for candidates for the nomination for governor on tbe Republican ticket at tbe primary election beld September 9th, at which plaintiff, intervener Wilber M. Brucker, and Edward J. Jeffries were the candidates. Claiming that tbe recount is being conducted illegally in many particulars, plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus to compel lawful procedure and count. Defendant and intervener have answered, denying illegality both in law and in fact. Tbe answers have been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Attorney General ex rel. Reynolds v. MayMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Bradley v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Lindstrom v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Attorney General ex rel. Scott v. GlaserMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- People ex rel. Hayes v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gould v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Elliott v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Tsongas v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Ryan v. Wayne County Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Wells v. Kent County Board of Election CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.