Legal Opinion
Wolfsen v. Wheeler
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1933No. Docket No. 4691PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff in this action had judgment against the defendants for the sum of $660, for and on account of the death of 46 head of sheep, alleged to have been the result of the negligent spreading of poison in a certain field which the plaintiff had leased for pasturing sheep Also, for the loss of the pasturage on the leased field.
The record shows that the plaintiff had leased a certain tract of land in Merced County for the purpose of pasturing sheep thereon; that prior to the time the plaintiff turned his sheep on to the leased field the defendants, for the purpose of killing rodents, had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- G., C. & Santa Fe R'y Co. v. EvansichTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Rudd v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Dowler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Texas Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. StanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Kersten v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Reif v. MorrisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Whitt v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.