Legal Opinion

Pollack v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1985No. L.A. 31912PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

Once again we are called upon to interpret the ambiguous wording of a recently amended statute. In this case, the issue involves the *371meaning of certain language in Vehicle Code section 13352,1 as amended in 1981.

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appeals from a judgment setting aside its one-year suspension of Bruce Pollack’s driving privileges pursuant to section 13352, subdivision (a)(3), following Pollack’s second drunk driving conviction within five years. The sole issue is whether the DMV may suspend a license of a twice convicted drunk driving offender under section…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hough v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. Superior Court (Douglass)California Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Troppman v. ValverdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API