Legal Opinion
Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1984PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan (94 AD2d 229). We also note that the Board found that the actual occupants of the apartment under the lease were Robert J. Castle and his wife and that the apartment was not their primary residence. That being so, Michael Castle, their son, had no right to renewal of the lease based upon section 235-f of the Real Property Law (L 1983, ch 403).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Order affirmed, with costs,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by62 opinions
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- S & D Petroleum Co. v. TamsettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Avon Bard Co. v. Aquarian FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- 300 West 49th Street Associates v. New York State Division of HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.