Legal Opinion
Myers v. Frankel
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided September 25, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*226OPINION OF THE COURT
Gustin L. Reichbach, J.
The instant motion and cross motion present a factual pattern clearly unanticipated by the recently amended sections of the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of NY § 26-516 [RSL]), the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 8632 [a] [1] [ETPA § 12 (a) (1); L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended]), and the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR 213-a).
In April 1990 the defendants entered into what purported to be a sublease agreement with plaintiff Lucie Myers for the premises at 15 Pierepont Street, second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldsmith v. Howmedica, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rockefeller v. MorontNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Zafra v. PilkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Avon Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Primrose Management Co. v. DonahoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Myers v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Myers v. FrankelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
- Bragston Realty Corp. v. DixonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999