Legal Opinion
Taejon Bristle Mfg. Co. v. Omnex Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Republic of Korea corporation, and conducting business there, instituted this action against the defendant to recover $8,730 for fur skins sold and delivered to the defendant, a New York corporation. The defendant has asserted a counterclaim based upon an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of the goods.
The defendant served a notice, pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to take the deposition of the plaintiff by its president and general manager, also a resident of Korea. The place of the proposed examination is New…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Morrison Export Co. v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Worth v. Trans World Films, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Ormond Beach First Nat. Bank v. JM MONTGOMERY ROOF. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Marlowe v. First State Bank of JacksboroCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
- William F. Jobbins, Inc. v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- In Re Adele HalkinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.