Legal Opinion

Morga v. Friedlander

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 19, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

In this appeal, we must decide whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, Harry P. Friedlander (Friedlander) and Susan O. Friedlander, his wife, and against appellant, William E. Morga (Morga). We affirm.

FACTS

On February 27, 1981, Morga filed a complaint against the Friedlanders seeking contribution and contractual damages with respect to a lease dated April 10, 1980. Morga alleged that Friedlander, acting on behalf of the community, failed to pay his share under the lease in question and that Friedlander also breached an oral…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Quates v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Green v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Washington RSA No. 8 Ltd. PartnershipIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brewer v. Washington RSA No. 8 Ltd. PartnershipIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Molique v. Allen, Unpublished Decision (2-6-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API