Legal Opinion

Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 21, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 6406PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERSON, Judge.

The primary issue in this appeal concerns the propriety of an award of attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs-appellees, three attorneys who appeared in propria persona in this matter. The trial judge found that conditions precedent to a real estate purchase contract were not fulfilled and ordered that plaintiffs be refunded their deposit and awarded them attorneys’ fees. We affirm the ruling of the trial court with respect to the merits of this action, but reverse the award of attorneys’ fees.

I. FACTS

Plaintiffs-appellees James B. Connor, Kevin E. O’Malley, and Jon A. Titus…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winer v. Jonal CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weaver v. LaubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. O'CONNELL v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Sweis v. ChatwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Frohmiller v. HendrixArizona Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Swanson & Setzke, Chtd. v. HenningIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Strohm v. Clearone Communications, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Formento v. Encanto Business ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API