Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. Caldwell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1994No. 94-0896PublishedCited by 181 opinions

1Per curiam

In this discovery mandamus, we consider whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the production of certain documents. Because a majority of the Court concludes that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering Relators to produce a file containing privileged documents, we conditionally grant the writ.

An automobile accident occurred between Jill Mullinax and Charlotte Farley in January 1991. Mullinax was insured by State Farm and represented by State Farm claims adjustors Danny Humphreys and Harlan Holiner. Farley sued Mullinax in Dallas County; the parties settled before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Peeples v. Honorable Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Novak v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by181 opinions

  1. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kerlin v. AriasTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. LeggatTexas Supreme Court · 1995

176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API