Legal Opinion

In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2004No. 03-0464PublishedCited by 314 opinions

1Per curiam

In the suit underlying this petition for mandamus, nearly 400 plaintiffs sued E.I. DuPont de Nemours (“DuPont”) and over 100 other defendants for alleged asbestos-related injuries from 1935 to the present. In response to the plaintiffs’ discovery request, DuPont asserted claims of attorney-client and/or work product privilege with respect to 607 documents.

On May 12, 2003, the trial court issued an order requiring DuPont to turn over most of the documents, ruling that DuPont had not made a prima facie showing of privilege. A divided court of appeals declined to grant mandamus relief. 133…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Humphreys v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by314 opinions

  1. In re LipskyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. LpTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Texas Integrated Conveyor Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Conveyor Concepts, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston, Inc. v. John Moore Services, Inc. and John Moore Renovation, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. Kerlin v. AriasTexas Supreme Court · 2008

309 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API