Legal Opinion

McCord v. Slavin

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1904No. Sac. No. 1116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, C.

By section 1 of an act approved March 24, 1893, (Stats. 1893, p. 341,) the legislature authorized the sale of “any of the lands uncovered by the recession or drainage of the waters of inland lakes, and inuring to the state by virtue of her sovereignty, or the swamp and overflowed lands not segregated by the United States,” to any person desiring to purchase the same, upon his making an application therefor in conformity with the provisions of said act.

Section 5 of the act declares: ‘ 1 The swamp and overflowed lands designated in this act shall be sold and patented at the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Miller & Lux v. Enterprise Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Miller & Lux v. BatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Keeran v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Crosby v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Teachers Assn. v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Gill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. California Teachers Assn. v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API