Miller & Lux v. Enterprise Canal & Land Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to restrain the defendants from diverting water from the San Joaquin River by' means of a certain dam and ditch. The plaintiff Miller & Lux and the intervener, Mowry, assert rights as riparian owners on the river below defendants’ dam. The plaintiff the San Joaquin and Kings River Canal and Irrigation Company asserts rights as the owner of a ditch constructed long prior to that of defendants, and also as a riparian owner on the said river. The court below rendered judgment as prayed for against defendants in favor of Miller & Lux and the intervener, and there is no appeal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turner v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ely v. . Supervisors of Niagara CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Lawrence v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Leach v. AitkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Meyer v. YesserIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Hurwitz v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Finnegan v. LafontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Germo Manufacturing Co. v. McClellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.