Crosby v. Lyon
California Supreme Court
In the, Supreme Court of the State of California The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, J.:
This is a proceeding under the forty-ninth title of the Practice Act, to obtain a writ of mandamus, commenced by the Superintendent of Common Schools for the County of Placer against the Auditor of that county, to compel him to apportion to the School Fund of that county certain moneys derived from certain taxes levied by the Board of Supervisors upon the property of the Central Pacific Railroad Company of California for the support of common schools.
The petition shows that for the year 1868 the Board of Supervisors levied a tax of eighteen cents upon each one…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- District Township v. County JudgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rozanne E. King Alisha Jane King Dacie S. Houston, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of Skylar Dwayne Ostrander, Chay Cortez Ostrander, and Adlia William Cortez Flood III Brandy R. Drake, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of Logan Genner Luhmann, Susan Maule, Stephanie Maule, and Jacob Maule Michael Campbell, Individually and as Father and Next Friend of George Campbell and SophSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- California Teachers Assn. v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Long Beach City School District v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- State ex rel. Ahern v. WalshNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- McCord v. SlavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.