Legal Opinion

A. C. Becken Co. v. Ottawa Pianophone Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1920No. Gen. No. 25,500PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Howard W. Hayes, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

On a trial before the court without a jury, plaintiff had judgment for $776.40, and defendant appeals.

Plaintiff had two contracts with defendant to make certain phonograph cabinets: one, dated January 11, 1918, was for 120 cabinets; the other, dated January 17, 1918, was for 40 fumed oak cabinets. In the first contract deliveries were to be made within 30 days and in the second contract.they were to be made “as early as possible.” Bach contract contained the following clause: “In case of coal shortage or a shut down of factory it is understood that you will furnish cabinets only. * * *”

Plainti…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Brewery v. Bemis & Curtis Malting Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Nichols v. Union Stock Yards & Transit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  3. Russell v. KœhlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Bryan v. Chicago & Alton RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Standard Brewery v. Hales & Curtis Malting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clemenson v. WhitneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  2. Roberts v. MinierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API