Legal Opinion
University Overland Express, Inc. v. Alsop
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHistman, J.
The plaintiff is a Massachusetts corporation which is, and has been since prior to June 1st, 1935, engaged in the transportation of automobiles by-motor vehicle for hire. In the course of its business it operates its motor vehicles over the highways of Connecticut, which operation it is agreed is wholly interstate in character. On August 17th, 1935, the plaintiff made application to the public utilities commission of Connecticut to engage in the transportation of property by motor vehicle for hire over the highways of this State as an interstate carrier, as required by General Statutes, Cum.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bailey v. Bruneau's Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Connecticut Television, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Gallahar v. George A. Rheman Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
- Tucker v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1941
- Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Board of Public Utility Com'rsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.