Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 25, 1952No. Civ. 650PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
This is a motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants made pursuant to rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.
The plaintiff in this case is Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal office in the city of ‘Cleveland, Ohio. The defendants are the Board of Public Utility Commissioners, Department of Public Utilities, State of New Jersey, and Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey.
The essence of the complaint is that an Interstate Commerce…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Juan T. Penagaricano, Acting Economic Stabilization Administrator v. Allen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- The Borden Company v. L. B. Liddy, Secretary of Agriculture of the State of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Bradley v. Waterfront Com'n of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. JessupDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.