Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided August 7, 1941No. Civ. A. 262PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, District Judge.

Emerson Tucker filed suit against Casualty Reciprocal Exchange as sole defendant seeking to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the negligence of Neel Gap Bus Line, Inc., planting his suit against Casualty Reciprocal Exchange upon the ground that it was the insurer of the bus line under the terms of a policy filed with the Georgia Public Service Commission to enable the bus line to comply with the provisions of the law of Georgia and to continue its certificate of public convenience and necessity in its operations over a designated route on the highways…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Eichholz v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Great American Indemnity Co. v. TickersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. University Overland Express, Inc. v. AlsopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  3. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Gallahar v. George A. Rheman Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API