Legal Opinion
Holland v. Cline Bros. Min. Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided February 1, 1995No. Civ. A. 3:93-1170PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are Third-Party Defendant United Mine Workers of America, AFL-CIO’s (“UMWA”) motions to dismiss the third-party complaints. Third-party Plaintiffs Lake Energy, Inc. (“Lake Energy”) and Cline Brothers Mining Co., Inc. (“Cline Brothers”) have responded, and the UMWA has replied. 1 The motion is ripe for adjudication.
I
The plaintiffs are certain Trust Funds and their representatives (“Funds”) established by the UMWA. They have sued both Lake Energy and Cline Brothers (“the Companies”) for contributions the Companies were obligated to make…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Roney v. GencorpDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2006