Legal Opinion
Morgan Creek Residential v. Kemp
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 2007No. C053098PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this case involving claims of equitable contribution and subrogation, plaintiff Morgan Creek Residential appeals from a judgment of dismissal, following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend, in favor of defendants Earl S. Kemp and Richard A. Haws. Plaintiff contends its complaint states a claim for equitable contribution from co-obligors and for subrogation under the California Uniform Commercial Code (undesignated section references are to the California Uniform Commercial Code) for monies paid by plaintiff pursuant to a letter of credit. As we shall explain,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re James S. Hamada, Debtor. James S. Hamada v. Far East National Bank, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- In Re Flamingo 55, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- Sullins v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- City of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles Employee Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.