Legal Opinion

Sullins v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 14, 2010No. 08-04927 CWPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

This case is based on the allegations that, during the time Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation owned the real property now owned by Plaintiffs, underground storage tanks leaked, contaminating the property, and that Defendant refuses to contribute to the cost of remediating the property. Defendant moves for summary judgment on three of the four claims in Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (TAC): (1) liability under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tesoro Ref. & Mktg. Co. v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  2. Masonek v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. City of Lincoln v. County of PlacerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Focus 15, LLC v. NICO CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Ruiz v. RuizDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API