Legal Opinion
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Ankerman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 7, 2003No. AC 22299PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, William L. Ankerman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court suspending him from the practice of law for a period of three years. Only one of the issues raised by the defendant on appeal merits discussion: The defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion for a mistrial in which he argued that the court failed to render its judgment within 120 days from the completion date of the trial.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*466The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the resolution of the defendant’s appeal. By letter dated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hauser v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Season-All Industries, Inc. v. R. J. Grosso, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Suffield Bank v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. ForvilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. AnkermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Antogiovanni v. America's Homes & Communities Real Estate, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. AnkermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003