Legal Opinion
State v. Ankerman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 17, 2004No. AC 23185PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The defendant, William L. Anker-man, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered *505after a jury trial, of larceny in the first degree by embezzlement in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 (1) and 53a-122 (a) (2). The defendant has raised twelve issues in his attack on his conviction. None of the claims has merit, and many of them were not preserved at trial. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably might have found the following facts from the evidence presented at the trial. The defendant was an attorney admitted to practice in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. BourguignonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Ankerman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Ankerman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.