Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Town of Fairfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 3, 1940PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff recovered judgment for the injuries suffered by reason of a defect in a street in the defendant town and the defendant has appealed. The street was under repair and the plaintiff was walking along it at night. The issues before us concern only the question of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. After both parties had rested and while the defendant’s counsel was arguing to the jury, he stated that no evidence had been offered to show that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence and that there should have been evidence as to the manner in which she…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. State v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. King v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Meallady v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HolmquistSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Toffolon v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API