Legal Opinion

Morton International, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1995No. Nos. C-940407, C-940430PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant-appellant and cross-appellee, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (“Aetna”), appeals from the July 23, 1993 judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas which ruled that the law of the state of Washington applies to the Western Processing Company and Standard Equipment Company claims (“claims”) against Aetna’s insured, plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant, Morton International, Inc. (“Morton”). Aetna advances three assignments of error in its appeal, alleging that the trial court erred by (1) applying the law of Washington and not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Groen v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. FFP Holdings LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API